Michael Burdell, Lawyer, Rest In Peace

Lawyer_killerIt has been twenty five years since attorney Michael Burdell fell in the line of duty, killed by Ronnie Lee Gardner in the now-demolished Metropolitan Hall of Justice in Salt Lake City.

Burdell  attended the Summum Church in Salt Lake City, an off-beat church that believes in extra-terrestrial visitors and mummification.

As an attorney, he was known to oppose the death penalty. He had served in Vietnam and since, as a member of the Utah bar, he hosted a regular radio talk show.

On April 2, 1985, Burdell had just completed a court hearing in which he represented another Vietnam veteran. He had then retreated to a basement archival room to help a member of the church with an adult guardianship application.

Gardner was facing a murder charge and was to meet with his two attornies and get ready for a pretrial hearing later that day.

As Gardner entered the courthouse lobby,  and although he was handcuffed, a woman accomplice suddenly ran up to him and gave him a .22 calibre handgun. Gardner immediately opened fire.

His guards, surprised by the sudden action, retreated and returned fire hitting Gardner in the shoulder. Gardner bashed through the nearest door and fell into a research room. There, he came across two lawyers, 38-year old Michael J. Burdell and Robert Macri.

Gardner cocked his gun at Macri but when Burdell exclaimed "Oh my God!", Gardner turned and shot Burdell, twice. The shots were at point blank range. One of the bullets entered Burdell's skull through the eye and caused fatal injury.

Macri hid behind a door and Gardner was then distracted by the guards who were giving chase. He managed to get to the front lawn of the courthouse when he collapsed from his shoulder wound.

But Burdell did not move. He would die of his wounds within hours. Death, the finality of it all ... in the line of judicial duty.

Gardner, a punk then only 23, stood trial for the death of attorney Burdell.

He was convicted and sentenced to die.

But for decades, he benefited from years of litigation, legal appeal after legal appeal all resulting in the continuation of his life at public expense.

Meanwhile, the Canadian Coalition Against the Death Penalty (I'm not a member) hosted Gardner and posted this:

"Greetings from Death Row. My name is Ronnie Lee Gardner. I'm 39 years old and I've been on Death Row for almost 15 years. I'm anticipating having my sentence overturned real soon and I'm looking for someone that would be interested in helping me write a book. I don't have the skills to do it myself, that's why I'm looking for someone with excellent writing skills to help me with my project. There are many twists, turns, plots and subplots to my story. I've had numerous people tell me I should write a book about my life but I've never been able to find the right person for the job. I think now is the perfect time to get this project rolling. If you are interested in helping me with my project and have the skills, let's get started. Please contact me as soon as possible. I'm looking forward to hearing from you. Always and forever, Ronnie Lee. Contact me at: Ronnie Lee Gardner #14873, Death Row. P.O. Box 250. Draper, UT 84020"

On Friday, April 23, 2010, himself exhausted by all the legal briefs and hearings, Gardner appeared before state court judge Robin Reese at the Matheson Courthouse and chose death by firing squad on June 18, 2010.

REFERENCES:

Posted in Crime and Criminal Law, Legal Profession and Lawyers
on
by

Comments

martha

martha
Friday, June 18, 2010 11:39 AM
you do the crime you do the time, and i dont think that death row should get to appeal after appeal, use the texas law if more than three people saw you do the crime you go strait to the front of the line. states complain that they have no money for education, we should re-evaluate our system. and what happened to the girl who went there to give him the gun she should be in as much trouble.

Edward

Edward
Monday, July 19, 2010 11:48 AM
Martha,
Me, my mother and my wife all saw you kill that guy last summer. So sorry, bye bye.

PS, can I have your TV?

Plo Kiju

Plo Kiju
Thursday, January 13, 2011 8:17 PM
Martha, I am a proponent of the death penalty for certain crimes, and I feel that Gardner deserves it more than most. But *Texas*? Where for the past ten years there has hardly been a month where a conviction and/or death sentence wasn't overturned due to re-examination of the case (cop turned out to be lying, juror was sleeping with prosecutor, white judge gives death sentences to 18% of white murderers, but 84% of black murderers) or new technology for evaluating evidence (DNA tests, blood tests, ballistics modeling) or even worse, like when the government needed someone to make an example of so they let another killer go free in exchange for (false) testimony that condemned a higher-profile killer.

Texas. Where the number of death penalty convictions rises just before every election, because the politicians need to be seen as tough on crime. Where 4 people in the last 3 months have been released after DECADES in prison for crimes they didn't commit. 45 years in prison for a crime they didn't commit - how can we ever make that up to them? To their families? And how much more horrifying would it be if they had been put to death, only to be exonerated later?

No, the death penalty is needed, but the appeals process is needed more. We supposedly have a government based on checks and balances, and a judicial system based more on justice than on revenge. The appeals system is the only thing separating us from barbarians... let's not be so eager to tear it down.

Because Edward has it right - you don't think you could ever be wrongfully convicted, but neither did many of the people who were. An enemy with a grudge, a chance similarity in appearance to a suspect, a judge who believes your constant protestations of innocence are just an act... it CAN happen to you, we know this, because it DOES happen to people sometimes. Don't be so eager to discard the appeals process that will be your only hope if this happens to you.
Young and Young
Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:48 AM
Wow, it blows me away that security isn't tighter than that. How a handcuffed man got a gun and was able to kill baffles me.

Post Comment

CAPTCHA image