Texas Judge Caught on Tape Beating His 16-Year Old Daughter: Brings Corrective Force Debate Into Focus

The ubiquity of the Internet has done yet another difficult but ultimately good deed to law and justice in revealing the abusive parenting of a Texas judge.

The video contains graphic material difficult for some but reminiscent of their own experiences for others. The child - now 23 - is not permanently, physically injured during the video.

CORRECTIVE FORCE TO SOME, CHILD ABUSE TO OTHERS.

This video should be mandatory viewing for all those who participate in the debate on the use of corrective force upon children as a parenting strategy because it reflects the horrific moments of those children at the moment of the infliction of vigilante justice.

It also exposes the arbitrary and discretionary nature of corporal punishment on children which is administered or not based entirely on the assessment of some adult, and rarely a measured or even helpful response to a situation which requires discipline or consequence.

Aransas, Texas judge William Adams, some seven years ago, beat his then-16 year old, handicapped daughter for alleged misuse of the Internet.

Unknown to him, her webcam surreptitiously captured the event. The daughter anticipated her father's reaction to her alleged misconduct and had set the stage. For that, some may hold that her dramatic screaming must be discounted in some small part.

But consider Judge Adams' language as he beats his almost-adult daughter with a belt:

"Bend over the f--king bed, dammit! Lay down or I'll spank your f--king face… I have to f--king beat you into submission. You want to put some more computer games on? You want some more? F--king computer... See all the problems they cause? You don't deserve to f--king be in this house."

In the video, the child's mother, Hallie Adams, is also a willing, even enthusiastic participant.

The video was placed on YouTube by an anonymous user on November 1, 2011. This description accompanied the video:

"2004: Aransas County Court-At-Law Judge William Adams took a belt to his own teenage daughter as punishment for using the Internet to acquire music and games that were unavailable for legal purchase at the time. She has had ataxic cerebral palsy from birth that led her to a passion for technology, which was strictly forbidden by her father's backwards views. The judge's wife was emotionally abused herself and was severely manipulated into assisting the beating and should not be blamed for any content in this video. The judge's wife has since left the marriage due to the abuse, which continues to this day, and has sincerely apologized and repented for her part and for allowing such a thing, long before this video was even revealed to exist. Judge William Adams is not fit to be anywhere near the law system if he can't even exercise fit judgment (sic) as a parent himself. Do not allow this man to ever be re-elected again. His "judgment" is a giant farce.

"I was holding onto the video until the right time and after a barrage of harassment from my father over the phone, I snapped and finally uploaded it. Now I'm sorry I didn't do it sooner.

"I am still shocked that so many people are this enraged. But please, don't threaten my father. I only want him to finally repent.

"Signed, Hillary Adams, his daughter."

The daughter Hillary Adams has a profile on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/shoehedgie, where she typically uses to post videos of her pianist recitals. It has been bombarded with supportive comments extolling her courage in posting the video.

The mother, Hallie Adams, now separated from Adams, spoke of the family violence with the national press:

"(It is) something that I've been hiding for a very long time. It's a family secret. I was completely brainwashed and controlled. I did every single thing he did."

According to Channel 6 News in Christi-Corpus, Texas (KRISTV), Hallie also posted this on Facebook:

"I am praying for my daughters and me and my family to heal in all ways from emotional and physical abuse, for the current and continuing abuse of my children and me that has been ongoing to end - starting now - for my daughters to both finally be able to go to counseling both individually and as a family group with their Dad's approval, encouragement, involvement and support, for him to finally make amends to all of us, talk openly with us, and take the first steps to letting our broken family heal."

WHO IS THIS JUDGE?

Judge William AdamsState County Court (Aransas) trial judge William Adams sits at the Rockport Court House, where additional police presence have been assigned, as well as protecting his person and residence, as death threats have been received.

He received his Doctor of Jurisprudence/Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree from the University Of Houston in 1991 and was called to the State Bar of Texas in that same year. As of November 2, 2011, the State Bar reports no disciplinary proceedings in his regard. He was re-elected to his judicial position in 2010 and is not up for re-election until 2014.

On November 2, 2011, the Aransas County Police Department, inundated with media inquiries about the video, issued a statement; that the matter was under review and:

"Please refrain from communication … on this matter until the review has been completed. Calls, emails, and faxes only create disruptions for other ongoing county business. The public's cooperation would be most appreciated."

Adams' boss, Judge Burt Mills had a similar request posted on the Aransas County website.

Judge Adams spoke to a local television station (Kristv.com, Corpus Christi, Texas), and asked the world to chill out:

"It happened years ago. I apologized. It's not as bad as it looks on the tape."

In fact, his daughter told him ahead of time that she was planning on posting the video as a form of counseling to deal with the years of abuse.

"I said, I can post the video, of you beating me on the Internet, and he said, 'well, you can do that if it makes you feel better.' So I did." 1

Late in the day, on November 2, Judge Adams took a 2-week leave of absence. It'll likely be a lot longer as a police investigation has been launched.

HE'S NO LONE STAR

The Texas Penal Code, at §22.01, defines an assault as follows:

"A person commits an offense if the person ... intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another...."

But then, one finds 9.6.1:

"The use of force, but not deadly force, against a child younger than 18 years is justified if the actor is the child's parent ... and when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is necessary to discipline the child or to safeguard or promote his welfare."

William Adams is not the disease; he is but a symptom of the heavy reliance upon corrective force so deeply embedded in the culture of Texas. The State of Texas is still one of 20 states in America that allows corporal punishment in schools. Hitting children with a belt or a stick is common. The Fort-Worth Star Telegram reported:

"The 2006-07 school year, the most recent period with statewide statistics available, more than 49,000 Texas students were paddled."

One has to wonder if the paddle is improving these young children one smack at a time, or whether it is nothing more than a felon farm.

Judge Adams is an old hand at how the world turns. To get his conduct the best possible light before the one agency that could punish him, he self-reported the tape to the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct where it will be given a case number and rolled into the conveyor belt of judges judging judges. That also allows him to formally decline any further comment by hiding behind the doctrine of sub judice. And it may also keep the hounds at the local police department at bay.

And because - and only because of the Internet and video recording - there is no media spin or hiding for Judge William Adams.

The man behind the face is on tape.

And that man may yet have inadvertently laid the ground for a change in both culture and law among the 25-million citizens of the Lone Star State.

REFERENCES:

]

Posted in Crime and Criminal Law, Current Events
on
by

Attached Images

  • Texas Judge Caught on Tape Beating His 16-Year Old Daughter: Brings  Corrective Force Debate Into Focus

Comments

Sherrie Hoover

Sherrie Hoover
Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:39 PM
How disgusting! He was clearly out of control and spanking in anger. I found it funny that he needs extra security due to threats. Maybe he might live in daily fear like he put his family through. Maybe somone will do to him what he did to his daughter.... Then he can say how truely sorry he is.

L D Hidden

L D Hidden
Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:04 PM
Sherrie: so many children live with this in our own neighborhoods. My dad was an alcoholic and belt-user until I stood up to him physically, so I've "been there done that".

To me, the real sad part is that the video makes some squeamish and to others, it's déjà-vu. But a judge ... the emotional abuse he throws at his 16-year old daughter as he whips her. Dude! You're f--cked up!

But for the record, I think an eye for an eye is rarely a Solomonic approach and certainly not here.

corey k

corey k
Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:30 PM
that's texas for you.
ignorant and violent.

L D Hidden

L D Hidden
Thursday, November 03, 2011 1:27 PM
But Texas gave us Davy Crockett, Buddy Holly, Carol Burnett, Walter Cronkite, Lyndon B. Johnson, Bruce DeWitt, ZZ Top....

Lance

Lance
Thursday, November 03, 2011 1:59 PM
It seems as thought the mother tried to mitigate the situation by taking the belt away and hitting 'once' herself. Complicit, no doubt, but subtly protective within her power at the time.
Linda Price
Thursday, November 03, 2011 9:14 PM
This crazy bastard needs someone to hold him down and beat him black and blue. But they to strip him off first. Then they need to get his wife. I guess he thinks he is above the law. It's terrible to have someone like this that sits and judges other people.

Glenn Thomas

Glenn Thomas
Friday, November 04, 2011 4:42 PM
Whoa, Linda. The hypocrisy of your statement is outstanding. Well done.

Having been a recipient of corporal punishment myself (and gone on to lead a happy non-criminal life) I can say I learned very early on, fighting it only made things far worse.

After getting over the shock of the video, it's clear she did nothing to help her situation. The longer she held out and disobeyed, the more he lost his temper. As the article points out, this was staged by her to highlight an abusive parent. I can't see her actions as being totally innocent.

Before I'm lamb based though, a spanking, at 16 yrs old, for installing a computer program is a *total fail* on his part. Losing his temper and taking it out on her, much worse. He clearly needs help. But criminal? Not sure I'd go that far.

Andrew

Andrew
Wednesday, November 09, 2011 2:10 PM
Having also experienced my share of family violence, I'd need to disagree that fighting it makes it worse; quite the opposite, doing nothing and saying nothing makes it worse. Blaming the victim for resisting as a justifcation for added violence is as ridiculous as justifying rape because she said refused a date.

She may have staged the camera and appeals for help, but one needs to distinguish between motive and action. There's a clear disconnect between elliciting anger (installing a program), her choice, and assault with a weapon (belt), his choice. There is nothing to disable the judge from less abussive disciplpine such as a clear verbal message, warning to restricting computer time, etc. The choice and therefore accountability was therefore his alone, regardless of the staged camera.

While deciding its criminality depends on the state laws, one need only peruse through China's or Iran's human rights abuses to see not all laws are free from criticism. If it's so acceptable, why not allow this in public? Why not allow it to each other? Why not punish other people's children the same way? To allow beating of minors is simply prejudicing under age children to be subject to assault, or to presume they are parent's property and void them of human rights until they are 18. It's unacceptable and everyone knows it.

L D Hidden

L D Hidden
Wednesday, November 09, 2011 2:18 PM
Glenn and Andrew (and Linda), thank you very much for your insightful and personal comments. I regret to see that others have had a belt-user parent too! One day (I think I was 11 or 12), I simply told my father there would be no more corporal punishment. This resulted in a brief wrestling match, with no clear winner. Luckily (as I was not prepared to back down), my father took the chance at a draw, and the high road and left the room. There were no future attempts at corporal punishment.
Linda Price
Wednesday, November 09, 2011 9:17 PM
I,m glad that someone besides me thinks that this was awful. This girl could not hardly walk. Even if she did something really bad, she or no other child needs to be beat. I got my shareof whippings ,but they were nothing like that. It is alot of people that are just mean, without a heart or any feelings. Remember the attorney a few years back that beat his little adopted daughter to death? These little children has noone to help them and are usually to scared to tell.

Another Taxpayer

Another Taxpayer
Friday, November 25, 2011 6:29 PM
The elite deviant behavior of the Judge with regards to his daughters condition has affected his career and status. It culminated in a beating for a trivial infraction. These are deep mammal and cultural psychological attitudes which our justice system has extreme difficulty in addressing. Courts were and are designed to keep the money flowing in the right direction. The system can use all kinds of statutes as smoke and mirrors to defend or convict. It is a game that is why it is played on a court. Expecting the world to treat you fairly because you are a good person is a little like expecting a bull not to attack you because you are a vegetarian”

L D Hidden

L D Hidden
Saturday, November 26, 2011 12:07 AM
Dear Another Taxpayer: I hope you're not right. I've been in the legal profession for 25 years and I've never seen any proof that "Courts were and are designed to keep the money flowing in the right direction ... the system can use all kinds of statutes as smoke and mirrors ... it is a game..." But I note your opinion which is good to voice and hear: you've had different experiences.

gerarda canning

gerarda canning
Thursday, December 01, 2011 4:36 AM
It will be interesting to see if this judge is re-elected, the people will voice their feelings via their vote. Clearly the laws concerning this issue need to be reviewed and ammended. In times gone by, a gazzilion yrs ago...children were defined as 'property', under the law. Corporal punishment was accepted and encouraged. Most developed countries have moved forward and made the much needed changes. Texas seems to be lagging behind. This judge may very well have been within his legal right to do what he did, and he seems to know this already.

Another Taxpayer

Another Taxpayer
Tuesday, December 06, 2011 9:27 PM
You should check. We are all defined as property. Application and Registration at birth are a form of begging. The Republic of Texas has harvested several Bankster clones. Paraphrasing Colonel Edward Mandell Homes: "Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property (that's you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government. We are ran by these people.

L D Hidden

L D Hidden
Friday, December 09, 2011 11:25 AM
Holy crap, Another Taxpayer. Dude! I couldn't follow your train of thought. I promise, I tried! Nor could I see link with Texas judge's actions in beating his teenage daughter with a belt. So we'll leave that comment up for posterity and hopefully people smarter than me will get it and be so warned about the cloned banksters and plausible deniability.

Jack

Jack
Tuesday, February 07, 2012 1:10 AM
I actually think he was right and within his rights as a parent. He'd already set the limits of her computer usage and she disobeyed obviously time and again. From what I see he had one of three alternatives.
1. To correct her
2. To get rid of the computer which she was using supposedly to do her schoolwork. So that's not really helping her or him in better preparing her for the real world.
3. To throw her out of the house and let her do as she damn well pleases and let society correct her wrongs.
It boils down to either the parents correct their children or society will do it for them in due course. From what I see he was trying to raise a 16 yo girl that more than likely was defiant, unruly, and in her eyes grown. You have to give them freedom so they can build self confidence and learn how to make their own decisions but you can't let them overrun you in your own home either and I'm pretty sure this girl knew she was pushing the limits and knew the consequences of crossing the line. Also there was no real damage so she wasn't abused and her actions were corrected in a manner that didn't involve any oversight or further supervision.

Jack

Jack
Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:04 AM
I think I would like to further my comment since the issue isn't just about parenting but about corporal punishment as a corrective force. As a parent I don't see a problem with it because it's done out of love and in the child's best interest but I don't believe that it should be allowed in institutional settings because it's not done in the child's best interest. It's done as a form of punishment to bring order to the institution. In other words I send my child to school to learn the 3 R's etc. but I don't particularly agree with our administrators or politicians views of right and wrong and I don't necessarily agree that they are in my child's best interest. In fact I'm completely against the government using fear tactics to keep order and I find it very offensive and intrusive to subject it to children.

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above: