Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Adjourn

The postponement, suspension and interruption of an ongoing hearing or meeting to resume at some future date; to break off for later resumption.

At common law, a meeting is deemed to have the power to adjourn itself although many by-laws, rules or other constitutional documents vests this authority exclusively with the chair of a meeting, if the chair is supported by a majority of members.

Judges typically have the power to adjourn the hearing of a case such as §33 of the Supreme Court of Canada Act:

“The Court may adjourn any session from time to time and meet again at the time appointed for the transaction of business.”

In parliamentary law and procedure, according to Horsley’s Meetings – Procedure, Law and Practice, p. 84, the word is sometimes misused and is:

“... acquiring a further, derived meaning of ‘close, conclude or finish’…. When a meeting concludes its business and finishes, the customary term is ‘closes’ (not ‘adjourns’) even if some agenda items have not been dealt with and are left over until a later meeting.”

Contrast this statement with Robert’s Rules of Order, 10th Edition (2000) which states:

“To adjourn means to close the meeting.”

In a meeting, a motion to adjourn, if seconded and accepted by the chair, takes precedence over the debate then occurring, if any, is debated and put to a vote.

In Procedures for Meetings and Organizations:

“The motion (to adjourn) formally closes the meeting. Any unfinished business dies with the meeting and can only be considered at another meeting if specifically placed on the new agenda. The motion can be moved at any time during the meeting, but the move or cannot interrupt a speaker who has the flor. If the motion is passed, the meeting closes abruptly.”


REFERENCES OR FURTHER READING:

  • Kerr, K. and King, H., Procedures for Meetings and Organizations (Toronto: Carswell, 1996), page 210.
  • Kerr v Wilkie 6 Jurist Reports, New Series 383 (1860)
  • Stoughton v Reynolds 1736 Fortescue’s King’s Bench Reports 168
  • Robert, H., Robert’s Rules of Order, 10th Edition (Cambridge, Mass.: Perseus Publishing, 2000)
  • Taggart, W. J., Horsley’s Meetings – Procedure, Law and Practice, 2nd Edition (Sydney: Butterworth, 1983)

Latest LagMag headlines:

China Politburo - Take A $%##@!@@ Hike

A lone student stands-down a row of four communist tanks and still, 19 years later, lawyers and international law experts with far less courage, ... tremble and wait.

Banning the Use of Hand-Held Cell Phones While Driving

What is with banning hand-held cell phone use while driving that's so difficult for law-makers? Maybe this will help: The Emperor has no clothes! The Emperor has no clothes!

Birthday Legal Information Ramblings

It only takes two psychiatrists to lock someone away. Birthday or not, here's enough to find ten.


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »


Switch to variable width

Switch to fixed width

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top