Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Alibi

A defence to a criminal charge to the effect that the accused was elsewhere than at the scene of the alleged crime.

Latin: elsewhere.

An alibi means that at the time and place of the crime, the accused was elsewhere.

In R v Gottschall, Justice Macdonald adopted these words:

"A prisoner or accused person is said to set up an alibi when he alleges that at the time when the offence with which he is charged was committed he was elsewhere. That is, at a place so far distant from that at which it was committed that he could not have been guilty."

Justice Townshend wrote, in R v Haynes:

"An alibi means proof of the absence of the accused at the time the crime is supposed to be committed, satisfactory proof that he is in some place else at the time."

Often described in criminal law textbooks as a defence, it is not really a defence per se.

In R v Demers, Justice Hall wrote:

"In its essence a defence of alibi is nothing more than a plea of not guilty, because the accused was not present at the place where the offence was committed on the occasion indicated.

"Once introduced, the evidence of the prosecution is, for the moment, suspended, and the judge or jury is bound to examine the evidence offered in support of the alibi, since it is clear that, if the alibi be established, the accused could not be the guilty party."

In R v Hibbert, ¶55, Justice Arbour agreed with the following instructions to a jury where an alibi has been raised by the defence:

"... if you accept the evidence in support of the defence of alibi, you must return a verdict of not guilty if you find that these times just do not allow for this accused to have committed the acts alleged.

"If you do not accept the evidence in support of the defence of alibi, but you are left in a reasonable doubt about it, you must return a verdict of not guilty.

"Even if you are not left in a reasonable doubt by the evidence in support of the defence of alibi, you must still go on to determine whether or not on the basis of all the evidence the accused is guilty."

REFERENCES:

  • R v Demers (1926) 4 DLR 991 (Quebec)
  • R. Gottschall 10 CCC 3d 447 (NSSC, 1983)
  • R v Haynes 23 CCC 101 (NSSC, 1914)
  • R v Hibbert (2002) 2 SCR 445
  • R v Littleboy (1934) 2 KB 408

Are we missing anything? If you think there is a term that should be included, please send us the suggestion

  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • LawMag

Latest LagMag headlines:

H1N1 Law - Swine Law for a Swine Flu

In a state of public health law anarchy, professional hockey players receive a killer flu vaccine while infants and pregnant women wait.

More...

The Death of the Common Law: Expiry date, 2100

Just about now, but for the economic might of the United States of America, the last funeral bell tolls of the common law would be fading.

More...

Gretzky Law

The recent Phoenix Coyotes debacle, in which he left behind his job, is not the only time Wayne Gretzky has had to leave from the side exit of a courtroom.

More...


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top