Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Contributory Negligence

The negligence of a person which, while not being the primary cause of a tort, nevertheless combined with the act or omission of the primary defendant to cause the tort, and without which the tort would not have occurred.

In the 2006 edition of Charlesworth & Percy on Negligence, the authors define contributory negligence as follows:

"(Contributory negligence) applies solely to the conduct of the claimant (plaintiff). It means that there has been some act or omission on the claimant's part which has materially contributed to the damage caused and is of such a nature that it may properly be described as negligence."

In Nance, Justice Simon described contributory negligence as:

"... a sharing of responsibility for damage where a person suffers damage as a result partly of his own fault and partly of the fault of any other person or persons...."

In Pilloni, Justice Davidson of the New South Wales court wrote:

"The term contributory negligence can properly only be applied to a case where both parties, the plaintiff and the defendant, are each guilty of negligence so connected with the injury as to be a cause materially contributing to it."

Examples of contributory negligence as it plays out in a tort action include a plaintiff injured in a motor vehicle accident caused by another but not wearing a seatbelt at the time of collision (Froom), walking across a road without looking for traffic, or the fact that a plaintiff, at the time the damages occured, was under the influence of alcohol (Stinton).

Some jurisdictions do not entirely leave the law of contributory negligence to the whims of judicial assessment. For example, the 2009 version of the British Columbia Negligence Act provides, at §1:

"If by the fault of 2 or more persons damage or loss is caused to one or more of them, the liability to make good the damage or loss is in proportion to the degree to which each person was at fault....

"... if, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, it is not possible to establish different degrees of fault, the liability must be apportioned equally."

French: négligence de la victime.

REFERENCES:


Are we missing anything? If you think there is a term that should be included, please send us the suggestion

  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • LawMag

Latest LagMag headlines:

H1N1 Law - Swine Law for a Swine Flu

In a state of public health law anarchy, professional hockey players receive a killer flu vaccine while infants and pregnant women wait.

More...

The Death of the Common Law: Expiry date, 2100

Just about now, but for the economic might of the United States of America, the last funeral bell tolls of the common law would be fading.

More...

Gretzky Law

The recent Phoenix Coyotes debacle, in which he left behind his job, is not the only time Wayne Gretzky has had to leave from the side exit of a courtroom.

More...


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top