Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Gift

A transfer of property with nothing given in return.

A transfer of property with nothing given or expected in return.

In strict common law, no contract, with attendant reciprocal legal obligation, exists wiithout consideration. But for a gift, the absence of consideration is a requirement.

As Justice Jackett wrote in Littler v Canada:

"A contract of sale, which is, by definition, a transfer of property for a consideration, cannot be a gift, which is, by definition, a disposition of property without consideration."

In Re Bayoff Estate, the Court adopted this list of requisite elements for a valid gift:

"(A)n intention to donate; acceptance of the gift; and a sufficient act of delivery."

GiftAt issue in the Littler decision was income tax and in particular the oft-involved concept of gifts. As of 2007, the Canadian Government allows the deduction of taxable income by the value of a gift to specified persons, such as registered charities.

Income tax statute routinely modifies the common law definition of a gift to fit the particular needs of tax policy.

The American Internal Revenue Service (IRS), as of 2007, takes this position in regards to gifts:

"Gifts include money and property, including the use of property without expecting to receive something of equal value in return. If you sell something at less than its value or make an interest-free or reduced-interest loan, you may be making a gift."

This is the circa 2007 Canada Revenue Agency's position on what a gift is:

"A gift is a voluntary transfer of property without valuable consideration to the donor. However, under proposed legislation, for gifts made after December 20, 2002, a transfer of property for which you received an advantage ... will still be considered a gift for purposes of the Income Tax Act as long as we are satisfied that the transfer of property was made with the intention to make a gift. An intention to make a gift will be presumed where the fair market value (FMV) of the advantage does not exceed 80% of the FMV of the transferred property."

The common law definition appears to exclude the value of gratuitous services from the definition of a gift.

In Slobodrian v. Canada, the Federal Court had to consider "whether amounts claimed by the (retired Université Laval  professor) as charitable donations meet that description under the Income Tax Act. In particular, is the provision of professorial and research services, on a voluntary basis, a gift...?"

In words that any tax lawyer would quickly process to advantage for his clients, the Court concluded that:

"A gift for income tax purposes must involve the transfer of something known to law as property.

"The mere supply of services without compensation involves no property and hence cannot form the subject matter of a gift.

"This is to be contrasted with remunerated services which once performed give rise to rights capable of ownership and which can in turn form the subject matter of a gift. The simplest example of this would be the remunerated worker who assigns gratuitously his right to the remuneration which he has earned. In the present case, it is common ground that the applicant was to render his services without any form of compensation."

In civil law, the concept is known as either "donation" or "gift". The Civil Code of Quebec defines a gift as:

"1806. Gift is a contract by which a person, the donor, transfers ownership of property by gratuitous title to another person, the donee; a dismemberment of the right of ownership, or any other right held by the person, may also be transferred by gift. Gifts may be inter vivos or mortis causa."


Refererences and Further Reading:

Latest LagMag headlines:

Pro Bono Hypocrisy

Envelope please! (Drum roll.) The award for pro bono works goes to ... John Doe, Esquire and Q.C. ..... because he has the highest rates to his paying clients and he can afford to charade as a poverty avenger!

End of the World Law

As we all march to our lemming-like demise upon the cliff of environmental disaster, a path of law back to safety may yet be found.

Polygamy Now Safely Brewed In British Columbia?

The Provincial government's top law enforcement officer toys with not prosecuting polygamists and bigamists, anticipating a Charter ass-kicking in Court. If so, law is orphaned and we all suffer.


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »


Switch to variable width

Switch to fixed width

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top