Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Indian

Nomenclature selected by Canada and USA to refer to and define their aboriginal or indigenous people.

In the USA, Title 25 of the US Code is entitled "Indians".

However, there is no single legal definition of what is an "Indian" in the United States. Government agencies and tribes have differing criteria to determine eligibility for programs, services or membership.

Membership in an Indian Tribe is key for American Indians to qualify for services, benefits and privileges provided by the United States government.

In Canada, Indians are a subgroup of those who are recognized as aboriginal (also known as First Nations or indigenous).

The British North America Act (now Constitution Act, 1867) gives to the Federal government legislative jurisdiction for "Indians, and Lands reserved for the Indians" (at §91(24))  but does not define the term.

Indian head dressHogg writes:

"The word has a dubious provenance, having originated in a mistake by Christopher Columbus who thought he had discovered India in his voyages across the Atlantic Ocean.

"The federal Indian Act defines the term Indian... and establishes a register to record the names of qualified persons.... The status then devolves ... to their descendants.... They alone enjoy the right to live on Indian reserves and various other Indian Act privileges. There are about 700,000 status Indians in Canada"

Imai writes that there are 46 distinct Indian tribes in Canada (which that author refers to as nations and which the Government calls bands) and that:

"The federal government ... imposed a registration scheme under the Indian Act.... Indians registered under the Indian Act are referred to by the federal government as status Indians and their communities are called bands..... Indians who, for some reason or another, are not registered under the Indian Act are called non-status Indians."

The Canadian Courts have evolved the constitutional definition to include Métis and Inuit (or Eskimo) but they are not recognized as such pursuant to the Indian Act and privileges associated therewith.


REFERENCES:

  • Constitution Act, 1867 (U.K.), 30 & 31 Victoria, Chapter 3, published at canlii.org///en/ca/const/const1867.html
  • Hogg, Peter, Constitutional Law of Canada (Toronto: Thomson-Carswell, 2007), page597.
  • Imai, S., Aboriginal Law Handbook, 2nd Edition (Toronto: Carswell, 1999).
  • Indian Act, RSC 1985, Chapter I-5, published at canlii.org/ca/sta/i-5/
  • Re Eskimos 1939 SCR 104

Are we missing anything? If you think there is a term that should be included, please send us the suggestion

  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • LawMag

Latest LagMag headlines:

H1N1 Law - Swine Law for a Swine Flu

In a state of public health law anarchy, professional hockey players receive a killer flu vaccine while infants and pregnant women wait.

The Death of the Common Law: Expiry date, 2100

Just about now, but for the economic might of the United States of America, the last funeral bell tolls of the common law would be fading.

Gretzky Law

The recent Phoenix Coyotes debacle, in which he left behind his job, is not the only time Wayne Gretzky has had to leave from the side exit of a courtroom.


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top