Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Resolution

The formal decision of an organization. A motion which has obtained the necessary majority vote in favor.

In parliamentary law and procedure, a motion of a single member becomes a resolution of the whole meeting if it carries; if it obtains necessary number of votes.

A resolution is what a motion seeks to become.

It is by resolution that an organization or company makes decisions and speaks.

As aptly put in the 2nd edition of Horsley’s, at page ¶608:

“Until and unless a resolution is passed, a meeting does not accomplish anything that a real effect; i.e. it does not produce a result which has any potency at all nor … any legal significance.

"But when a resolution has been passed, a legally binding decision has thereby been made.”

Practitioners of parliamentary law and procedure or company law or rules of order generally characterize resolutions by reference to the majority required for the underlying motion to carry.

A resolution in which requires a simple majority of those voting is called an ordinary resolution.

Special or extraordinary resolutions are those which require specified majorities, usually either two-thirds or three-quarters of the members present and entitled to vote. These types of resolutions generally relate to changes to the organizations constitutional documents and therefore, as a precautionary measure, a three-quarters or two-thirds majority is required.

For example, the Canadian federal incorporation statute, known as the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA), prefers the term “special resolution” which it defines at §2 as:

“’special resolution’ means a resolution passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast by the shareholders who voted in respect of that resolution or signed by all the shareholders entitled to vote on that resolution.”

Special or extraordinary resolutions are generally required for significant constitutional changes within the organization. For example, the CBCA requires a special resolution to dissolve a company (§210).


REFERENCES OR FURTHER READING:
  • Canada Business Corporations Act, RSC 1985 Chapter C-44, published at canlii.org/ca/sta/c-44/
  • Taggart, W. J., Horsley’s Meetings – Procedure, Law and Practice, 2nd Edition (Sydney: Butterworth, 1983)

Latest LagMag headlines:

China Politburo - Take A $%##@!@@ Hike

A lone student stands-down a row of four communist tanks and still, 19 years later, lawyers and international law experts with far less courage, ... tremble and wait.

Banning the Use of Hand-Held Cell Phones While Driving

What is with banning hand-held cell phone use while driving that's so difficult for law-makers? Maybe this will help: The Emperor has no clothes! The Emperor has no clothes!

Birthday Legal Information Ramblings

It only takes two psychiatrists to lock someone away. Birthday or not, here's enough to find ten.


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »


Switch to variable width

Switch to fixed width

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top