Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Statute of Frauds

A statute that set a minimum standard for enforceable contracts, usually requiring at a minimum something in writing or the actual exchange of reciprocal obligations, at least in part.

The original statute of frauds was that of England in 1677.

Historically, a contract for the transfer of a legal interest in land entailed a complex assortment of legal procedures and officers, including those points of detail necessary to acommodate the requirements of a feudal system.

By the 1600s, the exigencies of commerce were such that the formalities were overwhelming and often not complied with. Custom was thus changed so that land, in at least some circumstances, could be transferred based only on oral contract, albeit with a bit of ceremony.

In the result, wrote C. Browne in 1895:

"... great danger was incurred of such transfers being attempted to be proved by false and fraudulent means."

Statute of FraudsIn an earnest attempt to arrest fraud and ensure that contract cases seeking judicial recognition or enforcement had, at a minimum, one or several of minimal requirements as set out in statute, primarily aimed at, but not limited to,  requiring an instrument of sale in writing for any transfer of an interest in land.

The 1677 statute, inspired by Roman and civil law, was described by Baker as providing:

"... that no contract for the sale of goods for more than £10 should be good unless the buyer accepted part of the goods and actually received them, or gave something in earnest to bind the payment or in payment, or there was writing."

But the statute had the opposite effect. To use the words of Henry Reed: "It has been said to cause more fraud than it prevented."

The English courts tried to stem the tide but to only partial avail. Eventually, even those in commerce began to ignore its impractical provisions. In most jurisdictions where the statute survives at all, it is limited to land: e.g., in order for a contract purporting to dispose of land to be enforceable, it must be in writing.

REFERENCES:

  • Baker, J. H., An Introduction to English Legal History (London: Butterworths-LexisNexis, 2002), page 350.
  • Browne, Causten, A Treatise on the Construction of the Statute of Frauds as in Force in England and the United States (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1895), page 4-5.
  • Duhaime, Lloyd, Contract Law, Part 7: Interpretation of Contracts, published at www.duhaime.org/LegalResources/Contracts/tabid/339/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/92/Part-7-Interpretation-of-Contracts.aspx
  • Reed, Henry, A Treatise on the Law of the Statute of Frauds and of Other Like Enactments in Force in the United States of America and in the British Empire (Philadelphia: Kay & Brother, 1884), pages 1-3.

Latest LagMag headlines:

Legal Advice to Mark Cuban: Ferme Ta Geule.

Mark Cuban, the outspoken owner of the Dallas Mavericks, like any client that talks to the press, helps himself hurt himself.

Sisters In Law

Not so long ago, those with legal power (men) thought that giving women license to practice law would be a disservice to the "natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex.

Blogging To Death In The Name of Almighty God

In some Muslim countries, law blogging is a hazardous occupation.


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »


Switch to variable width

Switch to fixed width

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top