Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Negligence

A failure to act as a reasonable person would be expected to act in similar circumstances.

Not only are people responsible for the intentional harm they cause (called intentional torts), but their failure to act as a reasonable person would be expected to act in similar circumstances (i.e. "negligence") will also give rise to damages.

Everyone has an ongoing duty to conduct themselves, and manage things under their control, with care as towards other persons. Everybody has a duty to ensure that their actions do not cause harm to others.

Negligence, if it causes injury to another, exposes the tortfeasor to tort or personal injury liability.

Negligence is assessed against an objective standard, having regards to the circumstances and to the standard of care which would reasonably be expected of a reasonable person in similar circumstances. The law looks at what a hypothetical reasonably prudent person might have done in similar circumstances.

car accidentFor experts selling or offering their services to others on that basis, their standard will be elevated to a similar and qualified expert.

Legal theorists, like Canadian law professor Allen Linden in Canadian Tort Law (Butterworths), have tried to break down what can be a very complex area of the law, into an "ABC rule", as follows:

"A plaintiff in a negligence action is entitled to succeed by establishing three things to the satisfaction of the court: (A) a duty of care exists; (B) there has been a breach of that duty; and (C) damage has resulted from that breach."

In Ryan v The City of Victoria (1999 1 SCR 201), Canada's Supreme Court opined that:

"Conduct is negligent if it creates an objectively unreasonable risk of harm. To avoid liability, a person must exercise the standard of care that would be expected of an ordinary, reasonable and prudent person in the same circumstances. The measure of what is reasonable depends on the facts of each case, including the likelihood of a known or foreseeable harm, the gravity of that harm, and the burden or cost which would be incurred to prevent the injury."

Between negligence and the intentional act there lies yet another, more serious type of negligence which is called gross negligence.

Gross negligence is any action or an omission in reckless disregard of the consequences to the safety or property of another. See also contributory negligence, comparative negligence and criminal negligence.

Comparatively, Quebec's Civil Code defines negligence in terms of civil liability and as follows, at ¶1457:

"Every person has a duty to abide by the rules of conduct which lie upon him, according to the circumstances, usage or law, so as not to cause injury to another.

"Where he is endowed with reason and fails in this duty, he is responsible for any injury he causes to another person by such fault and is liable to reparation for the injury, whether it be bodily, moral or material in nature.

"He is also liable, in certain cases, to reparation for injury caused to another by the act or fault of another person or by the act of things in his custody."

Are we missing anything? If you think there is a term that should be included, please send us the suggestion

  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • LawMag

Latest LagMag headlines:

H1N1 Law - Swine Law for a Swine Flu

In a state of public health law anarchy, professional hockey players receive a killer flu vaccine while infants and pregnant women wait.

More...

The Death of the Common Law: Expiry date, 2100

Just about now, but for the economic might of the United States of America, the last funeral bell tolls of the common law would be fading.

More...

Gretzky Law

The recent Phoenix Coyotes debacle, in which he left behind his job, is not the only time Wayne Gretzky has had to leave from the side exit of a courtroom.

More...


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top