Duhaime.org
Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

The Constitution Comes Home (1980)

October 23, 1980 will forever remain an unforgettable day of debate in the House of Commons.

The Liberal government under Pierre Trudeau was contemplating a measure of closure to prod along the debate on the repatriation of the Constitution.

During question period, the leader of the opposition, Conservative Joe Clark (pictured, right) accused him of gagging Parliament.Joe Clark

When Trudeau responded that Clark "will realize that it is in the interests of the people of this country to have this constitutional matter dealt with expeditiously," opposition members chided: "Trudeau's railway".

John Crosbie then rose and accused the NDP of connivance with the government in the repatriation debate.

"Madam Speaker, we know that the prime minister and the leader of the New Democratic Party are heart to heart, toe to toe and nose to nose; and we know where the leader of the New Democratic Party's nose is!"

Trudeau responded that Crosbie "check if his brains are not constantly in the area that he suggested somebody else's nose is."

Ed Broadbent, the NDP leader rose and began to ask the prime minister a question on oil company profits, bringing on a fresh attack.

"Go on over," goaded one Conservative member, urging Broadbent to cross the floor and sit with the government.

"Ask him in caucus," joked another.

At 3:25 p.m., Speaker Jeanne Sauve called for orders of the day.

When Yvon Pinard, the President of the Privy Council tried to table the closure resolution, the House exploded into a flurry of procedural arguments.

After 15 minutes of wrangling, Sauve suspended the sitting for two minutes to consult with legal clerks, and then overruled the objections to Pinard's motion.

It was not the Tories last stand.

The last day of debate sending the repatriation of the Constitution proposal to a joint committee of the Senate and of the House clicked into last gear just past 1 a.m., October 24, 1980; when the speaker had to interrupt proceedings and call for the vote.

MR. DEPUTY SPEAKER - Lloyd Francis (Ottawa West): Order! Order! Order! In accordance with the provisions of Standing Order 33....

ROBERT WENMAN (Fraser Valley West): Mr. Speaker, I demand the right to be heard! I will not sit down until I have been heard! I demand protection from this House of Commons. I demand from the Governor General of Canada....

MR. DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order, please. The House will recognize the hon. member for Pembina on a matter of privilege.

PETER ELZINGA (Pembina): Thank you Mr. Speaker. I demand on behalf of myself and my colleagues the opportunity to participate in this debate. We have a responsibility to those individuals that elected us and I wish to exercise that responsibility. The prime minister gave a commitment that all members of Parliament would have an opportunity to participate in the discussion on our constitution. He has reneged on that promise.

MR. DEPUTY SPEAKER: The Chair finds there is no question of privilege. It is my duty at this point to interrupt the proceedings....

TOM COSSITT (Leeds-Grenville): This man is a dictator!

MR. WENMAN: You may not! We must be heard! The hon. member for Fraser Valley West will speak in the debate!

MR. DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order, please! Will the hon. member for Leeds please sit down?

MR. COSSITT: No! I demand to speak!

MR. WENMAN: No! I demand the right to speak on the Constitution for the people of my riding! It is my duty to protect my rights as an hon. member!

When Francis began to read Pinard's motion, Cossitt and Wenman left their seats in the House and walked to the base of the Speaker's dias.

There they pleaded with Francis to allow them to speak.

Francis was evidently staggered that the members would so aggressively challenge his authority.

At one point, a clerk suggested that Francis sit down which Francis angrily repudiated. "Hon. members can only make speeches from their places. Hon. members cannot be recognized from other places."

But to no avail.

For endless minutes, the grim face of the deputy speaker stood silently above the chorus of shouting voices, as the very nerve centre of Canadian democracy was under seige.

Two Conservatives were now five, having been joined by Elzinga and two other opposition members.

The Liberals sat in disbelief.

Behind the Speaker's chair, Jeanne Sauve stood in robes, ready to replace Francis but it was too late.

It was he, alone.

"We want the right to speak!"

"I demand the right to be heard!"

"This is a free country."

"Strand up for democracy."

"How does this man Trudeau run the country singlehanded like this?"

"Totalitarianism! Hitler; that's what it is!"

Then, as suddenly as it had began, Francis found his way out of the imbroglio.; he simply continued to read the resolution.

When he was finished, he called for the yeas and the nays.

"In my opinion, the nays have it," bellowed Francis, in a last breath of triumph, "Call in the members."

What happened next is legend.

Ron Irwin, a Liberal parliamentary secretary and former football player noticed Stanley Knowles approaching Clark, ostensibly to try to get Clark to control his troops.

Irwin decided to join with Knowles and walked across the floor to urge Clark to control his members.

It was the wrong time for a member of the government to tell the leader of the opposition how to act in Parliament.

Harvie AndreClark stood up and yelled at Irwin: "You get out of here!"

When Conservative Harvie Andre (pictured, left), saw his leader stand and then exchange finger jabs with Irwin, he jumped to his feet.

Irwin beat a hasty retreat and the Conservative Whip, Bill Kempling just managed to grab Andre before he reached Irwin.

The House had been spared from snap anarchy and the nation would repatriate its Constitution.

Published: Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Last updated: Wednesday, September 12, 2007
By: LloydDuhaime
Permalink

Comments

There are currently no comments, be the first to post one.

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Enter the code shown above:

Latest LawMag headlines:

Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:35:00 -0800

Mark Cuban, the outspoken owner of the Dallas Mavericks, like any client that talks to the press, helps himself hurt himself.

More...

Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:50:00 -0800

Not so long ago, those with legal power (men) thought that giving women license to practice law would bharm the "natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex".

More...

Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:54:00 -0700

In some Muslim countries, law blogging is a hazardous occupation.

More...

Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:40:00 -0700

The PR tanks are rolling out in British Columbia as lawyers take up arms against a fundamental rule change proposal suggested not just by an elected Attorney General but in the back drop, in black gown and red sash, the sheepish grins of superior court judges.

More...

Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:34:00 -0700

Trial, for the layperson (read "non-lawyer") is a source of tremendous stress and nervousness. You rarely see standing-room only line-ups at the public galleries of the Courthouse. But for lawyers, they are masochistic labours of love; a chunk of time where the stress is through the roof but so, too, is the intensity.

More...

Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:55:00 -0700

A lone student stands-down a row of four communist tanks and still, 19 years later, lawyers and international law experts with far less courage, ... tremble and wait.

Technorati ProfileMore...

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:08:00 -0700

What is with banning hand-held cell phone use while driving that's so difficult for law-makers? Maybe this will help: The Emperor has no clothes! The Emperor has no clothes!

More...

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:34:00 -0700

It only takes two psychiatrists to lock someone away. Birthday or not, here's enough to find ten.

More...

Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:46:00 -0700

We speaketh prematurely but the lovely knoll of ditching political correctness- sweeter sounding still as it rings from the home of the common law - has been heard and struck a beacon of light upon the shadow of law which naively wants to be all things to all cultures.

More...

Tue, 27 May 2008 14:52:00 -0700

British Columbia experiences two shining examples of police inaction - either cowardice or stupidity - in less than nine months.

More...

Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:14:00 -0700

Envelope please! (Drum roll.) The award for pro bono works goes to ... John Doe, Esquire and Q.C. ..... because he has the highest rates to his paying clients and he can afford to charade as a poverty avenger!

More...

Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:42:00 -0700

As we all march to our lemming-like demise upon the cliff of environmental disaster, a path of law back to safety may yet be found.

More...

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:07:00 -0700

The Provincial government's top law enforcement officer toys with not prosecuting polygamists and bigamists, anticipating a Charter ass-kicking in Court. If so, law is orphaned and we all suffer.

More...

Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:47:00 -0700

With sympathies to recovering European traffic victims and their families, and for the hospital food, the solution to your woes is simple. Three words; traffic law enforcement.

More...

Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:36:00 -0700

Much maligned since 1789, the bourgeois of France are back.

More...

Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:10:00 -0800

Gentlemen, dust off your armour and man your wigs.

More...

Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:34:00 -0800

Smut, crime and catch and release in the homeland of common law.

More...

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:32:00 -0800

Venture off your all-inclusive resort in Mexico and you'd better saddle 'up, partner (and bring a doggy bag and call your insurance broker .... )!

More...

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:14:00 -0800

A bored Canadian lawyer realizes how fascinating Mexico is ... and will be ....!

More...

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:02:00 -0800

The rise of sexsomnia as a defence to horrendous criminal acts continues unabated. Knocked down here and there, many are getting through including that of Jan Luedecke.More...


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »


Switch to variable width

Switch to fixed width

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top