Duhaime.org
Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Small Claims - British Columbia

In British Columbia, the Small Claims Court is actually the civil litigation arm of the Provincial Court of B.C. In a nutshell, it is highly deformalized but very much a court of law. Any claim of a value of $25,000 or less can be brought to this forum. A claimant can even bring a claim of a higher amount to the Small Claims Court, provided he truncates or "abandons part of the claim" to the limit of $25,000 (nor can a claimant split up a single cause of action into little parts all under the $25,000 threshold). The Small Claims Act also precludes any cases based on defamation or malicious prosecution. These latter claims, as those claims which exceed $25,000, must go to the Supreme Court. Note also that an appeal from the Small Claims Court is to the Supreme Court. Other cases, such as residential tenancy, are also precluded from the jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court.

Cost of a small claims claim is between $100 and $156 depending on how much you're asking for.

The Supreme Court judging tends to be of a better quality but the Court is "stuffier" and less "lay litigant"-friendly then the Provincial Court (for example, you have to call a judge "Lord" or "My Lady" in Supreme Court)!

In the Supreme Court, judges tend to frown on claimants that try to represent themselves, especially in complex matters of law.

This is actually cherished in the Small Claims. The procedures of the Supreme Court are more extensive and less forgiving than those of the Provincial Court. Costs are greater in the Supreme Court as well. Proceedings in the Supreme Court are also saddled with complex pre-trial legal procedures that only a lawyer could adequately understand; procedures which are not part of the Small Claims system. Nor is personal service always required as it frequently is in the Supreme Court; Small Claims actions can typically be served by double-registered mail.

One of the wonderful things about the Small Claims court is that the judge can "admit as evidence ... any oral or written testimony, record or other thing that the court considers is credible or trustworthy and is relevant to the matter being heard, even though the testimony, record or other thing is not admissible as evidence in any other court under the laws of evidence." Also, "a judge may conduct a trial without complying with the formal rules of procedure and evidence." That means that hearsay or parole evidence may be acceptable.

In one fell swoop, this section of the Small Claims Act allows the judge to "cut to the chase" of the case by eliminating many of the technical objections that lawyers like to use to implement their case strategy.

The Small Claims Court is presided by a judge of the Provincial Court. Procedure is guided by the Small Claims Rules, an easy-to-read, must-have document for anyone who will be presenting, or defending, a case before the Small Claims Court.

The first step to filing a claim is to fill out a notice of claim and file it in the Provincial Court registry nearest to where the defendant lives or carries on business, or where "the transaction or event that resulted in the claim took place." In other words, the plaintiff has a choice. The Rules set out special rules for serving companies.

The defendant then has a limited time from receiving the notice of claim to reply (again using a special Form), and including a reply filing fee. The registrar is responsible for serving (by mail) the reply on the other parties. The defendant is also allowed to counter-claim or to enjoin a third party, if he believes that this third-party "should pay all or part of the claim."

If the defendant does not file a reply, then you'd be well advised to move quickly for a default order and attaching a copy of the certificate of service. If the claim is for a debt, the registrar may make an order right away. If the claim is not for a debt, the registrar will set a date for a hearing before a Small Claims judge and the defendant is "not entitled to receive notice of a hearing under this rule". In fact, the right to reply is lost except with the special permission of a judge. The default hearing is to allow the judge to determine the amount of money, or other type of order which might be appropriate.

If the defendant does file a reply, a settlement conference is convened. All parties receive notice of the conference from the registrar. All parties must be at settlement conferences, with or without their lawyers failing which the judge has the authority to dismiss the claim or enter a payment order against the absent party. There are some exceptions. For example, a defendant who does not dispute liability, just the amount of the claim, may be excused. You'd better be prepared for the conference: the judge may order you to pay the expenses of the other party is the settlement conference cannot be conducted properly because a party is not prepared for it. The parties must bring all the documents that they are relying on such as correspondence, medical reports or records of expenses or losses incurred.

At a settlement conference, the judge has a wide variety of powers, all aimed at settling the case and avoiding trial if possible. For example, the judge may mediate between the parties, make an order if agreed to between the parties, and even dismiss the claim if the judge decides that it is not reasonable or "discloses no triable issue." Another important fact related to the conference is that up to that time, amendments to claims or replies may be done without the permission of the judge. After the conference, they may only be done with the permission of the judge.

Sandwiched into the process but usually before the settlement conference is mediation. This article doesn't allow for detailed review of the convulted thresshold which as to process, in any event, varies from registry to registry.

If it's off to trial you go, you'll need to summons witnesses using Form 8, which has to be served at least 7 days before the trial date. You can order that person to bring any records that may be required (ignoring a Small Claims summons can be serious; the rules say you can be jailed for it). Again, the consequences for not attending a trial when it has been set means that your claim or reply can be rejected.

The Small Claims courts are gentle with a defendant held liable for the payment of a money award. The judgement debtor can ask for a payment hearing at which time, the court may order a payment schedule.

Our lovely Government loves to change URLs without notice but until they do so, check http://www.ag.gov.bc.ca/courts/manuals/small_claims/index.htm for a comprehensive manual on our small claims system and process


This information, provided to you by Lloyd Duhaime, is for informational  purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or instruction.  Consult a lawyer or other legal professional for advice relating to a legal  problem. Laws and Court costs can be amended with little warning and change some  of the information below so make sure, if you want to "do it yourself", that you  consult official court or government publications such as the official statutes  of B.C. or the Gazette.

 

Published: Thursday, November 03, 2005
Last updated: Thursday, August 07, 2008
By: Lloyd Duhaime
Permalink

Comments

There are currently no comments, be the first to post one.

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.

Latest LawMag headlines:

Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:35:00 -0800

Mark Cuban, the outspoken owner of the Dallas Mavericks, like any client that talks to the press, helps himself hurt himself.

More...

Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:50:00 -0800

Not so long ago, those with legal power (men) thought that giving women license to practice law would bharm the "natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex".

More...

Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:54:00 -0700

In some Muslim countries, law blogging is a hazardous occupation.

More...

Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:40:00 -0700

The PR tanks are rolling out in British Columbia as lawyers take up arms against a fundamental rule change proposal suggested not just by an elected Attorney General but in the back drop, in black gown and red sash, the sheepish grins of superior court judges.

More...

Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:34:00 -0700

Trial, for the layperson (read "non-lawyer") is a source of tremendous stress and nervousness. You rarely see standing-room only line-ups at the public galleries of the Courthouse. But for lawyers, they are masochistic labours of love; a chunk of time where the stress is through the roof but so, too, is the intensity.

More...

Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:55:00 -0700

A lone student stands-down a row of four communist tanks and still, 19 years later, lawyers and international law experts with far less courage, ... tremble and wait.

Technorati ProfileMore...

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:08:00 -0700

What is with banning hand-held cell phone use while driving that's so difficult for law-makers? Maybe this will help: The Emperor has no clothes! The Emperor has no clothes!

More...

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:34:00 -0700

It only takes two psychiatrists to lock someone away. Birthday or not, here's enough to find ten.

More...

Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:46:00 -0700

We speaketh prematurely but the lovely knoll of ditching political correctness- sweeter sounding still as it rings from the home of the common law - has been heard and struck a beacon of light upon the shadow of law which naively wants to be all things to all cultures.

More...

Tue, 27 May 2008 14:52:00 -0700

British Columbia experiences two shining examples of police inaction - either cowardice or stupidity - in less than nine months.

More...

Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:14:00 -0700

Envelope please! (Drum roll.) The award for pro bono works goes to ... John Doe, Esquire and Q.C. ..... because he has the highest rates to his paying clients and he can afford to charade as a poverty avenger!

More...

Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:42:00 -0700

As we all march to our lemming-like demise upon the cliff of environmental disaster, a path of law back to safety may yet be found.

More...

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:07:00 -0700

The Provincial government's top law enforcement officer toys with not prosecuting polygamists and bigamists, anticipating a Charter ass-kicking in Court. If so, law is orphaned and we all suffer.

More...

Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:47:00 -0700

With sympathies to recovering European traffic victims and their families, and for the hospital food, the solution to your woes is simple. Three words; traffic law enforcement.

More...

Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:36:00 -0700

Much maligned since 1789, the bourgeois of France are back.

More...

Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:10:00 -0800

Gentlemen, dust off your armour and man your wigs.

More...

Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:34:00 -0800

Smut, crime and catch and release in the homeland of common law.

More...

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:32:00 -0800

Venture off your all-inclusive resort in Mexico and you'd better saddle 'up, partner (and bring a doggy bag and call your insurance broker .... )!

More...

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:14:00 -0800

A bored Canadian lawyer realizes how fascinating Mexico is ... and will be ....!

More...

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:02:00 -0800

The rise of sexsomnia as a defence to horrendous criminal acts continues unabated. Knocked down here and there, many are getting through including that of Jan Luedecke.More...


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »


Switch to variable width

Switch to fixed width

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top