Duhaime.org
Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Legal Aid in British Columbia

Technical Stuff

Every Canadian province has an agency which dishes out legal aid referrals to private lawyers, or through a centralized group of lawyers. Each province has different scopes of services.

British Columbia's is a good example as it has recently evolved to limit assistance to few but the most needy. For example, in family law cases, violence or child protection must now be at issue - a new requirement for legal aid.

Since 1979, the BC legal aid program has been administered by the "Legal Services Society" under the auspices of the Legal Services Society Act (Chapter 30 of the 2002 Statutes of British Columbia).

This independent agency structure is typical of legal aid programs, such as Legal Aid Ontario.

The Society is an independent, non-profit organization that reports to the BC Legislature. The provincial government is the primary funding source although a portion is also received from the federal government and, in varying amounts, the Law Foundation and the Notary Foundation.

The Society is now required to balance its budget and may not incur a deficit without the permission of the provincial Attorney General and the Minister of Finance.

The Society is directed by a 9-member board of directors appointed as follows:

  • Law Society of British Columbia appoints 4 members; and
  • the provincial Attorney General appoints 5 members.

As of May 14, 2007, according to the LSS website, four members of the Board were lawyers.

The Society is under a statutory duty to " to assist low income individuals to resolve their legal problems and facilitate access to justice for low income individuals".

Who/What Qualifies?

Specifically, the Act says that legal services should be made are available for a "qualifying individual" who:

  • is a defendant in criminal proceedings that could lead to the individual's imprisonment;
  • may be imprisoned or confined through civil proceedings;
  • is or may be a party to a proceeding respecting a domestic dispute that affects the individual's physical or mental safety or health or that of the individual's children;
  • has a legal problem that threatens
    • the individual's family's physical or mental safety or health,
    • the individual's ability to feed, clothe and provide shelter for himself or herself and the individual's dependents, or
    • the individual's livelihood.

To put that into plain language, and generally speaking:

  • There's a dual-qualification criteria: your legal problem must qualify and your income must be below certain levels.
  • While the threshhold for eligibility changes from time to time, as of April 2006, it was, generally, for a household of three, a "net monthly income" of $2,427.
  • Legal Aid may also deny coverage based on assets if they are of a substantial value.
  • As to the type of 'legal' problem covered, and again generalized for the sake of this article, Legal Aid covers only criminal cases where imprisonment is a possibility and in rtegards to family law issues, if there is a violence or child protection component.

In some cases, you may receive legal aid but it will not be completely free; you may be asked to pay a small user fee called a "contribution" (between $25 and $100). This will be the case if your income is higher than BC Benefits rates.

You are under an ongoing obligation to inform the Society of any advantageous changes in your income. This is because if your finances improve such that you exceed the limits for legal aid, you may suddenly be responsible for paying your lawyer. In cases where you receive a monetary settlement or you are successful in obtaining and enforcing a court order, you may be asked to pay the legal aid office back for part or all of the money it has paid your lawyer.

The Society investigates complaints received from legal aid clients about their lawyers or about legal aid delivery. I have often been involved in family law cases where eligibility for legal aid has been a substantial issue because once a legal aid retainer has been issued, there is less of a financial incentive to settle. Correspondingly, a litigant paying for a lawyer out of his/her own pocket can quickly be beaten into (financial) submission by legal initiatives subsidized by a legal aid-financed litigant.

Some Final words....

Assuming that the applicant has all required information, the application is accepted or rejected fairly quickly.

If you are eligible for legal aid and if a registered lawyer has been identified on the application, the lawyer will be contacted and may be tendered a referral form. If you have not selected a registered lawyer on your application form, you may be referred to a local lawyer with an expressed interest or experience in the field of law in which you need legal services.

The lawyer then provides legal services to you but legal bills and is paid by the Society, in accordance with detailed rate tables as set out in binders published by the Legal Services Society head office. As of April 2006, that rate is about $80 an hour.

If your application for a legal aid referral is rejected, you are entitled to appeal the decision.

The program has been under political scrutiny since its inception. Many lawyers and law society groups have complained about the recent reduction of public funding for legal aid in British Columbia as well as delays in receiving payment from the Society. Neither is supposed to affect the level or timeliness of legal services provided to you.

It seems to me that, because this is a publicly funded service, subordination to political decision comes with the territory. However, some lawyers and special interest groups argue that reduction in funding for legal aid has resulted in some disadvantaged persons being denied access to legal representation.

Other criticisms include comments that the level of income required to qualify means that only the very poor can benefit from the program, leaving the population in low to mid-range income range unable to afford prohibitive private legal fees; and that funding should not be provided to provide free defence counsel for repeat criminals, regardless of income.


Researched and written by Lloyd Duhaime as a free public service. Any opinions expressed are solely those of Mr. Duhaime.

Warning: This information is not legal advice. Provincial laws and regulations or Legal Services Society or Law Centre policies, procedures or forms can change at any time, and with little or no notice. Therefore, this information, while believed to be accurate on May 14, 2007, can only be provided without warranty of any kind.

Click here to visit the official web site of the BC Legal Services Society.


Published: Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Last updated: Sunday, October 21, 2007
By: Lloyd Duhaime
Permalink

Comments

There are currently no comments, be the first to post one.

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.

Latest LawMag headlines:

Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:35:00 -0800

Mark Cuban, the outspoken owner of the Dallas Mavericks, like any client that talks to the press, helps himself hurt himself.

More...

Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:50:00 -0800

Not so long ago, those with legal power (men) thought that giving women license to practice law would bharm the "natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex".

More...

Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:54:00 -0700

In some Muslim countries, law blogging is a hazardous occupation.

More...

Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:40:00 -0700

The PR tanks are rolling out in British Columbia as lawyers take up arms against a fundamental rule change proposal suggested not just by an elected Attorney General but in the back drop, in black gown and red sash, the sheepish grins of superior court judges.

More...

Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:34:00 -0700

Trial, for the layperson (read "non-lawyer") is a source of tremendous stress and nervousness. You rarely see standing-room only line-ups at the public galleries of the Courthouse. But for lawyers, they are masochistic labours of love; a chunk of time where the stress is through the roof but so, too, is the intensity.

More...

Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:55:00 -0700

A lone student stands-down a row of four communist tanks and still, 19 years later, lawyers and international law experts with far less courage, ... tremble and wait.

Technorati ProfileMore...

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:08:00 -0700

What is with banning hand-held cell phone use while driving that's so difficult for law-makers? Maybe this will help: The Emperor has no clothes! The Emperor has no clothes!

More...

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:34:00 -0700

It only takes two psychiatrists to lock someone away. Birthday or not, here's enough to find ten.

More...

Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:46:00 -0700

We speaketh prematurely but the lovely knoll of ditching political correctness- sweeter sounding still as it rings from the home of the common law - has been heard and struck a beacon of light upon the shadow of law which naively wants to be all things to all cultures.

More...

Tue, 27 May 2008 14:52:00 -0700

British Columbia experiences two shining examples of police inaction - either cowardice or stupidity - in less than nine months.

More...

Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:14:00 -0700

Envelope please! (Drum roll.) The award for pro bono works goes to ... John Doe, Esquire and Q.C. ..... because he has the highest rates to his paying clients and he can afford to charade as a poverty avenger!

More...

Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:42:00 -0700

As we all march to our lemming-like demise upon the cliff of environmental disaster, a path of law back to safety may yet be found.

More...

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:07:00 -0700

The Provincial government's top law enforcement officer toys with not prosecuting polygamists and bigamists, anticipating a Charter ass-kicking in Court. If so, law is orphaned and we all suffer.

More...

Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:47:00 -0700

With sympathies to recovering European traffic victims and their families, and for the hospital food, the solution to your woes is simple. Three words; traffic law enforcement.

More...

Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:36:00 -0700

Much maligned since 1789, the bourgeois of France are back.

More...

Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:10:00 -0800

Gentlemen, dust off your armour and man your wigs.

More...

Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:34:00 -0800

Smut, crime and catch and release in the homeland of common law.

More...

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:32:00 -0800

Venture off your all-inclusive resort in Mexico and you'd better saddle 'up, partner (and bring a doggy bag and call your insurance broker .... )!

More...

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:14:00 -0800

A bored Canadian lawyer realizes how fascinating Mexico is ... and will be ....!

More...

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:02:00 -0800

The rise of sexsomnia as a defence to horrendous criminal acts continues unabated. Knocked down here and there, many are getting through including that of Jan Luedecke.More...


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »


Switch to variable width

Switch to fixed width

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top