Duhaime.org
Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Buying A Company in British Columbia

So you want to buy a business!

Some preliminary issues to consider, if applicable, include the Investment Canada Act, which allows federal government officials to review foreign purchases of Canadian businesses where the value is over a certain amount.

The new World Trade Organization agreement has affected this threshold. The topic exceeds the scope of this short, general article.

In addition, culturally-related industries may be subject to federal regulation as well.

Also, be aware of the federal Competition Act which, again, allows federal government officials to interfere in sizeable company purchases where the sale might result in substantially less competition. For more, please visit the web site of Canada's Competition Bureau although be forewarned; these guys move their URL around every few months.

In most scenarios, the purchaser will want to buy a business in one of two ways:

  1. buy all the assets or shares of the company;or
  2. amalgamate the company into that controlled by the purchaser.

Choosing between an asset or a share purchase can be a tricky matter. Tax considerations may tend to incline a purchaser towards an asset purchase. Typically, therefore, purchasers prefer buying the assets whereas the vendor will prefer selling shares.

If environmental, product liability or tax liabilities are suspected, the purchaser might be wiser to purchase the assets.

But a share transaction tends to be simpler, and therefore less expensive in legal and accounting costs. This is because an asset sale requires changing any applicable licenses.

If minority shareholders are involved and they don't want to sell, there are provisions that can be used to achieve the sale in spite of the objections of the minority shareholders not the least of which is the stated direction of the board of directors, controlled by the majority of shareholders.

As far as unions and employees, a share sale has no sunstantial effect. The employees continue to work for the company, their status unrelated to the purchase of shares. Even for asset sales, successorship applications under, for example, BC's Labour Relations Code can end up at the same result. The Labour Relations Board can bind the purchaser to any existing collective bargaining agreement (that Board is known to be very interventionist and operates with little effective judicial oversight).

There are many ways to finance the purchase of a business. Some of the more common include:

  • Vendor financing. The vendor is willing to wait for the full amount. This also has the advantage of giving the purchaser a holdback in case the vendor's promises or representations don't hold up. The vendor may want some kind of guarantee that the debt will be honoured. This can take the form of a mortgage or even an escrow agreement in which the shares are held by a third party until the purchase price has been paid in full.

  • Borrowing money from a friend or bank. These third parties may well be inclined to seek security on their money in the form described in provincial legislation such as the Personal Property Security Act.
  • Equity financing simply means selling shares in the new company to investors.

A battle between the vendor and purchaser will inevitably occur over responsibility for the liabilities of the company especially assumed indebtedness, which is a technical word used to refer to money liabilities such as accounts payable or bank loans. These are usually adjusted for in the final price but expect a vendor to request a written release.

The real debate may hover over the representations and warranties that the vendor made inducing the purchaser to buy. The purchaser will try to hold the vendor to those statements even after the closing date, to protect himself from misrepresentation. The vendor will try to exempt himself fully or, at the very least, set a short time frame during which he will be exposed to liability related to his former company.

Another frequent issue in business sales is the restrictive covenant, whereby the purchaser will attempt to prevent the vendor from starting or joining another company (for a certain period of time) which would then compete with the company being purchased. For comment on this topic, readers are directed to the Restraint of Trade section of the Canadian Contract Law Centre.

Clearly, buying or selling a business in Canada involves weighing a large number of elements and being wary of many possible pitfalls. No matter how big or small the business may be, you would be best advised to spend a bit of money up-front and see a member of the Law Society obtaining proper legal advice, than run the risk of a botched do-it-yourself job.

This information, provided to you by Lloyd Duhaime, contains necessary generalizations, any of which could be inapplicable because of your specific fact matrix. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice or instruction. Consult a member of your provincial Law Society or other legal and professional advice relating to a legal problem. Laws can be amended with little warning and change some of the information below so make sure, if you want to "do it yourself", that you consult official government documents such as the official statutes or the Gazette.

Published: Friday, October 20, 2006
Last updated: Friday, June 08, 2007
By: Lloyd Duhaime

Comments

Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!

Before logging in, register for an account
Both Pingbacks and Trackbacks are enabled.

Latest LawMag headlines:

Pro Bono Hypocrisy

Envelope please! (Drum roll.) The award for pro bono works goes to ... John Doe, Esquire and Q.C. ..... because he has the highest rates to his paying clients and he can afford to charade as a poverty avenger!

End of the World Law

As we all march to our lemming-like demise upon the cliff of environmental disaster, a path of law back to safety may yet be found.

Polygamy Now Safely Brewed In British Columbia?

The Provincial government's top law enforcement officer toys with not prosecuting polygamists and bigamists, anticipating a Charter ass-kicking in Court. If so, law is orphaned and we all suffer.


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »


Switch to variable width

Switch to fixed width

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top