Duhaime.org
Law · Legal Information · Justice
 

Blackstone, Sir William (1723-1780)

BLACKSTONE, William (1723-1780).

Blackstone's parents died when he was young but that never stopped this great English lawyer from sharing the great gift of legal knowledge, then selfishly-held by legal professionals.

He became a lawyer (i.e. "called to the bar") in 1746.

In 1761, he married Sarah Clitherow and in1768, he was elected to the British Parliament and in 1770, was appointed judge.

Starting in 1753, he began to give lectures on the "Laws of England" at the University of Oxford and had the foresight to retain his manuscripts, improving and enlarging the content annually. His lectures were a great success - students and others flocked to them - and in 1756, he published book 1 of his Commentaries on the Law of England, continuing until the publication of Book 4 in 1759.

For the first time, the common law was rendered readable and understandable by non-lawyers.

The Commentaries did for the law what Martin Luther had done to religion 250 years earlier, by translating the Bible from Latin to the language of the people. Overnight, the law was accessible to ordinary citizens.

Others, such as Thomas Wood in 1720 or even Sir Edward Coke in 1628 and 1640, had tried but their books sold poorly. Blackstone was a bestseller!

At first, his Commentaries were hotly contested, some seeing in it an evil or covert attempt to reduce or codify the common law; anathema to common law purists, then and now

William Blackstone In an author's preface, he noted that:

"No sooner was the work completed, but many of its positions were vehemently attacked by zealots."

Blackstone considered all the "animadverters" as opportunities andand where approriately, used them to further improve his publication, an initiative which gave his Commentaries credibility with the Courts who began to defer to the Commentaries as an accurate statement of the law

After his opening salvo as to the task at hand, Blackstone starts his Commentaries with:

"Law, in its most general and comprehensive sense, signifies a rule of action.... which is prescribed by some superior and which the inferior is bound to obey."

His 4-way split of the law was:

  • Book 1: Of the Rights of Persons
  • Book 2: Of the Rights of Things
  • Book 3: Of Private Wrongs
  • Book 4: Of Public Wrongs

His Commentaries on the Law of England became an important foundation of American law and even in England, the publication far exceeded the man himself.

Indeed, Blackstone fancied himself a legal academic and in spite of his fame amongst the people, chased his doctorate, professorship, and then a seat on the bench. He even became a member of the English Parliament but later declined an invitation to become England's Solicitor-General. It was shortly thereafter that he acceded to the bench. Stodgy legal academics jealously denounced his work but to no avail.

For decades, a study of his four volume Commentaries was required reading for all first year law students.

Lord Avonmore's spoke of him thus:

"He it was who first gave to the law the air of a science. He found it a skeleton and clothed it with life, colour and complexion. He embraced the cold statue and by his touch, it grew into youth, health and beauty."

Jeremy Bentham, who had been a critic of the Commentaries when it was first published, credits Blackstone with having:

"... taught jurisprudence to speak the language of the scholar and the gentleman; put a polish upon that ruged science, cleansed her from the dust and cobwebs of the office and, if he has not enriched her with that precision which is drawn only from the sterling treasury of the sciences, has decked her out to advantage from the toilet of classical erudition, enlivened her with metaphors and allusions and sent her abroad in some measure to instruct."

That was an understatement. The Commentaries were shipped to America and Canada, and subsequent British colonies such as Australia and New Zealand, where it shaped the law of those states.

To the general populace, he was a real hero. While legal purists chastised his simplistic version of the common law, English people embraced his plain language, plain truth version of the hithertofore esoteric law of the land.

The Commentaries were a snapshot of the common law as it existed in Blackstone's time. Some parts, considered today, show how we have evolved such as this extract and even as of his time, Blackstone describes this feature, in Book 1, with every qualification he can muster:

"The husband... by the old law, might give his wife moderate correction for as he is to answer for her misbehaviour, the law thought it reasonable to intrust him with the power of restraining her by domestic chastisement, in the same moderation that a man is allowed to correct his ... children.... The lower ranks of people, who were always fond of the old common law, still claim and exert their ancient privilege, and the courts of law still permit a husband to restrain a wife of her liberty in case of gross misbehaviour."

He spent the last twenty years of his life at his residence at Wallingford, just south of Oxford, in a building known as Castle Priory House.

Research and Further Readings:

Brightwell, C. L., Memorials of the Early Lives and Doings of Great Lawyers, 2002.

 

Published: Sunday, November 18, 2007
Last updated: Saturday, March 22, 2008
By: LloydDuhaime

Comments

Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
Click here to post a comment

Before logging in, register for an account
Both Pingbacks and Trackbacks are enabled.

Latest LawMag headlines:

Pro Bono Hypocrisy

Envelope please! (Drum roll.) The award for pro bono works goes to ... John Doe, Esquire and Q.C. ..... because he has the highest rates to his paying clients and he can afford to charade as a poverty avenger!

End of the World Law

As we all march to our lemming-like demise upon the cliff of environmental disaster, a path of law back to safety may yet be found.

Polygamy Now Safely Brewed In British Columbia?

The Provincial government's top law enforcement officer toys with not prosecuting polygamists and bigamists, anticipating a Charter ass-kicking in Court. If so, law is orphaned and we all suffer.


Read earlier headlines »
Subscribe to stay in touch »


Switch to variable width

Switch to fixed width

Unless otherwise noted, this article was written by Lloyd Duhaime, Barrister, Solicitor, Attorney and Lawyer (and Notary Public!). It is not intended to be legal advice and you would be foolhardy to rely on it in respect to any specific situation you or an acquaintance may be facing. In addition, the law changes rapidly and sometimes with little notice so from time to time, an article may not be up to date. Therefore, this is merely legal information designed to educate the reader. If you have a real situation, this information will serve as a good springboard to get legal advice from a lawyer.

top